- DXO OPTICS PRO VS LIGHTROOM 3 32 BIT
- DXO OPTICS PRO VS LIGHTROOM 3 PC
- DXO OPTICS PRO VS LIGHTROOM 3 PROFESSIONAL
However, compared to DXO, Lightroom's limits, quality and range of adjustments make it feel like a toy.ĭXO by contrast operates like a professional tool. Its History list of changes and ability to easily make a working copy enhances your ability to experiment. Most LR adjustments respond fast enough to see the results onscreen allowing, indeed inspiring experimentation with controls. (For those who don't get my sense of humor let me explain: Photoshop is notoriously (and deliberately) painful to use and learn, but even so there is no reasonably objective way to "measure" ease of use.) Lightroom is easy to use, measured as dramatically more intuitive and slightly more than 1,000 times easier than the same operation using Photoshop -). However, DXO generally makes higher quality images than Lightroom. LR 3 can often help provide very good images rapidly. 1.Summary:īoth programs are non-destructive meaning they do not tamper with the original image. If there is enough demand AND if I can find any time, I will include comparison images to illustrate many of the functions and problems. It also covers a few issues such as File Structure and Complexity, Correction History - and some unusual "features." The article briefly compares and contrasts the two programs' ability to correct Exposure/Brightness, HDR, Contrast, "Fill Light" or "Preserve Shadows" Correcting Horizons, Crop, Lens Aberrations, Tilt/Shift Building Straightening (Keystoning), Color corrections, Saturation, Vibrance/microcontrast, Sharpening Luminance, Color and Pattern Noise, and Dust spot removal.
DXO OPTICS PRO VS LIGHTROOM 3 PC
This means PC users need to use LR 3, andīecause of all this, a good technical comparison of LR 3 vs DXO 7 may be useful for a while.
DXO OPTICS PRO VS LIGHTROOM 3 32 BIT
Windows XP for PCs, or Mac's S now Leopard (OS 10.6.7 or any 32 bit Macs).
However, since -ġ) LR4 no longer runs on the two most popular operating systems : Yes, I do realize LR 4 is shipping - and that many will use it. If you buy anything through this article it will not cost you a penny more, but it will send us a few dimes to help provide you with articles like this one.) (I've added Amazon links to some of the products mentioned here.
If anything is unclear, let me know and I'll help.
I have made only the faintest of edits and additions to describe updates as of 2017. Now lots of people have asked to read it, so I cleaned it up a bit for general usage. This article comparing Lightroom 3.4 and DXO 7.1 began as a "cheat sheet" for fine art photographers to whom I teach DXO. (Wedding and Sport photographers typically have different demands: They generally need to correct hundreds of images quickly and easily, and ( in general !) are not quite as fiercely demanding of the highest quality.) That means developing one image at a time as high quality as possible often made with poor lighting. This article compares and contrasts how Lightroom and DXO work for Fine Art, Landscape, Wildlife, outdoor Fashion, Portrait and Architectural photographs. DXO, a French program, is not well known in North America. Lightroom and DXO Optics Pro are leading RAW image photograph correction programs.